Rotary.org: The Rotarian

Letters (December 2009)

  • Print
  • E-mail page

 
 

Test results

Fantastic article about Herbert J. Taylor and The Four-Way Test [“Is it the truth?,” August], and very well timed given the current state of the U.S. and global economies.
The Tallahassee, Fla., program mentioned in your sidebar “Testing, one, two, three” provides a great example of how to apply the test to community leaders while generating positive PR for Rotary. Since 1983, the Rotary Club of Green Bay, Wis., has had a Free Enterprise Award. This award is presented annually to an individual who has created substantial growth of a business entity responsible for providing local employment; has had a significant local economic impact; and has been actively involved in local charitable, civic, government, or service programs.
It has become one of the most coveted awards by leaders in the area. Our club uses it to promote Rotary as well as a fundraising dinner event for our club’s local foundation. On average, the event raises $25,000 annually while promoting the ideals of Rotary. More information can be found at www.greenbayrotary.com .
David Yeghiaian
Green Bay, Wis., USA

I found the August sidebar “A brief history of the golden rule” interesting. Two authors offer the platinum rule: Do unto others as they want done unto them. Imagine the possibilities.
Todd C. Ganos
Carmel, Calif., USA

I enjoyed reading the article about Herbert Taylor and The Four-Way Test. The article aptly described the ethics of the man and his contributions to Rotary’s ideals.
As the article noted, Taylor was born in Pickford, Mich., USA. He graduated from high school in Sault Ste. Marie, Mich. It should be noted that Rotarians from District 6290 (part of Ontario, Canada, and Michigan) and friends raised funds and erected a life-size bronze statue of Taylor. That statue stands proudly in downtown Sault Ste. Marie, adorned with appropriate inscriptions and a plaque with The Four-Way Test.
Bob Arbuckle
Apollo, Pa., USA

I read with interest your article about The Four-Way Test, but here is why it is wrong and should not be promoted by Rotary:
1) Is it the TRUTH? The truth is variable. It used to be the “truth” that the world was flat. And if you didn’t accept that truth, you were burned at the stake. Then for many years it was taught that the world was round. Now they say it’s elliptical because of the pull of gravity. Which is true?
2) Is it FAIR to all concerned? This seldom works. Is it fair to the villagers in Afghanistan when we have to bomb out a house where terrorists are hiding? The fact is that in life, you can’t always be fair to all concerned, and you have to try to make a good decision about what is best for the majority of people. Or, perhaps, your group.
3) Will it build GOODWILL and BETTER FRIENDSHIPS? Lawyers know that this is not the way the world works. When there is a dispute, to settle it in an amicable way, one has to reduce the level of unfairness that each party feels, and get the parties to agree to something they don’t like and don’t feel is fair but will accept to avoid further stress and conflict. Arbitrators often say that a good settlement is one where both sides feel cheated. It doesn’t build goodwill, and it certainly doesn’t lead to better friendships, but it does decrease stress and conflict in society. The backslapping, salesman type who is always trying to be liked and create goodwill is a thing of the past, if that sort ever existed.
4) Will it be BENEFICIAL to all concerned? This is certainly not the way the world works. Almost invariably, what is good for one person is negative for another. There may be some “win-win” situations in life, but it’s important for mature people to realize that not every action can be beneficial or even fair to all parties concerned, and that for life to move forward smoothly, some people have to sacrifice.
Merv Hecht
Santa Monica, Calif., USA

E-tips

I enjoyed Paul Engleman’s article on e-mail etiquette [Management, August]. I have three more rules:
- Send nothing that moves. For example, pens writing the sender’s signature over and over – very distracting.
- Don’t use screened backgrounds behind copy. Depending on screen density and type of design or pattern, these can make readers have to squint.
- Avoid attachments that could just as easily be pasted into the main message. In most cases, this saves space, as well as being two steps more reader-friendly. (Step 1, find link and open. Step 2, close the attachment and … what did that say? Step 1 … )
- Stay away from after-message pearls of wisdom and lengthy Draconian disclaimers below the signature. So you’re enamored of Confucius; maybe I’m not. And is your adage really in sync with the message in the e-mail? Draco, the ancient Athenian lawgiver, would enjoy the disclaimers that make you wonder whether you should just turn yourself in at the nearest police station. Notice that these never come at the start of a message, only well after the main text.
Roland Herwig
Edmond, Okla., USA

Half the solution

The article “Water and wellness” in the August issue got me thinking that clean water is just one half of the health issue. We need a similar solution for proper disposal of human waste. This would be an appropriate undertaking because one of the first Rotary club projects was a public toilet in Chicago.
Stephen Oldstrom
Ann Arbor, Mich., USA

Editor’s note: Watch for a special focus on sanitation in an upcoming issue.

Rotary fellowship

How nice to see the article “Globe-trotter” in the July issue [Up Front]. My wife, Jesmin (a secondary school teacher), and I were fortunate to be homestay guests of Mary Stitt for about a week in 2005 while we were visiting Chicago for the RI Convention. We are all members of the International Travel and Hosting Fellowship.
She took us to different Rotary-related programs, including a National Immunization Day volunteers picnic. Upon Jesmin’s request, she took us to visit the school that was named after her in 1992, as Olive-Mary Stitt Elementary School.
Her dedication and service remind me of Service Above Self. It is impossible to describe her in just a few words – like a great teacher, excellent mother, wonderful grandma, and dedicated Rotarian. She is much more than that. Jesmin and I will carry with us forever the greatness of Ms. Mary Stitt!
Sk. Abdul Hadi
Daulatpur, Bangladesh

Recognizing a hero

On behalf of my family in particular, and all Rotarians in general, I want to thank you for the fine article you wrote about my father, C. Wright Hollingsworth, a longtime Rotarian and Korean War veteran, in the June issue [“After 58 years, a Bronze Star,” Up Front]. Before I had even seen it, I received a congratulatory call from a fellow Rotarian in the Rotary Club of East Nassau, Bahamas, and then from many other friends around the world. We framed a copy for my father, who was extremely moved that his accomplishments as a veteran, as a Rotarian, and as a man would be recognized so vividly.
Without his long and active membership in Rotary, I never would have enjoyed the Rotary experience I do today. Without his heroism in Korea, and those gallant veterans who saved his life, neither I, my children, my brother and sisters, nor their children would exist today. Thanks for reminding us that we still have heroes among us, and that we should cherish them.
Lee Hollingsworth
Roswell, Ga., USA


5 Comments:
At 9:58AM on 24 September 2010, Bill Green wrote: When it comes to the 4-way test it may not always be the easiest way to go but if Rotarians are to continue to make a difference in the World it is a worthy objective to strive for. Humans are capable of the most appalling acts of inhumanity to one another but they are also capable of incredible acts of generosity and self-sacrifice. If these extremes represent how humans can be I feel we should strive towards being better human beings and I can think of no better test to point us in the right direction. In regards to the statement "It used to be the “truth” that the world was flat. And if you didn’t accept that truth, you were burned at the stake. Then for many years it was taught that the world was round. Now they say it’s elliptical because of the pull of gravity. I doubt anyone ever thought the world was flat. The ancient Greeks proved the World was a sphere and even calculated its mass. According to Stephen J Gould "there never was a period of 'flat earth darkness' among scholars (regardless of how the public at large may have conceptualized our planet both then and now). Greek knowledge of sphericity never faded, and all major medieval scholars accepted the earth's roundness as an established fact of cosmology. Historians of science David Linberg and Ronald Numbers point out "there was scarcely a Christian scholar of the Middle Ages who did not acknowledge [Earth's] sphericity and even know its approximate circumference". Historian Jeffrey Burton Russell says the flat earth error flourished most between 1870 and 1920, and had to do with the ideological setting created by struggles over evolution. Russell claims "with extraordinary [sic] few exceptions no educated person in the history of Western Civilization from the third century B.C. onward believed that the earth was flat," Bill Green Rotary Club of Walsall
At 10:57AM on 15 March 2010, Robert McDowell wrote: i have kept the 4 way test on the back of my business card for some 40 + years.....I look at it each and every day....I have a saying, If I cannot say yes to the 4 items of the 4 way test then I need to re think what I am doing.
At 9:37AM on 9 March 2010, C P Chandrasekaran wrote: I am of the view that 4 way test is a very precise way of instilling values in a heterogenous and diverse, multi cultural organisation like Rotary. I do not expect that every one can understand the four way test easily but that should not be the reason to abandon it. 99% of the Rotarians may not get 100% in test but I can assure that most of us can pass the test with 40% marks. I do not like the argument that the world works differently. If that is so, we are here to change the way it works and commitment to 4 way test is ne way to start...
At 1:26PM on 1 February 2010, Sam Wilbanks wrote: In response to the letter from Merv Hecht “Is the Four Way Test Relevant Today?” (December 2009) I had to respond. “I read with interest your article about The Four-Way Test, but here is why it is wrong and should not be promoted by Rotary: 1) Is it the TRUTH? The truth is variable. It used to be the “truth” that the world was flat. And if you didn’t accept that truth, you were burned at the stake. Then for many years it was taught that the world was round. Now they say it’s elliptical because of the pull of gravity. Which is true? a. Real truth is not variable. Certainly man’s understanding of the universe has and will continue to evolve over time, but “truth” in the Four Way Test really is about being honest in your personal and professional dealings with others. It is about being “authentic” in how you conduct yourself. It is also just one part of your character. It is possible for a person to be totally honest, but be of poor character. However, truthfulness is definitely a key aspect of character. So, to say that because our knowledge of “things” changes thus the truth is variable, and not important in ethical decision making is incorrect in my view. 2) Is it FAIR to all concerned? This seldom works. Is it fair to the villagers in Afghanistan when we have to bomb out a house where terrorists are hiding? The fact is that in life, you can’t always be fair to all concerned, and you have to try to make a good decision about what is best for the majority of people. Or, perhaps, your group. a. I would agree to the extent that the Four way Test does not make good war fighting doctrine. However, this does not negate the fact that striving for a fair outcome in business and personal decisions is one important aspect of conducting your life at a high ethical standard. Life is not always fair, and decisions and actions resulting from them may have adverse consequences for some. However, the act of considering fairness prior to acting will at a minimum disclose how to make the decision as fair as possible. If everyone took this approach, perhaps there would be no need to “bomb out a house where terrorists are hiding”. Perhaps there would be no terrorists at all. 3) Will it build GOODWILL and BETTER FRIENDSHIPS? Lawyers know that this is not the way the world works. When there is a dispute, to settle it in an amicable way, one has to reduce the level of unfairness that each party feels, and get the parties to agree to something they don’t like and don’t feel is fair but will accept to avoid further stress and conflict. Arbitrators often say that a good settlement is one where both sides feel cheated. It doesn’t build goodwill, and it certainly doesn’t lead to better friendships, but it does decrease stress and conflict in society. The backslapping, salesman type who is always trying to be liked and create goodwill is a thing of the past, if that sort ever existed. a. If both parties in the dispute could apply the Four Way Test to the dispute itself, there would probably not be a need for the lawyers in this case. Just because there are disputes in the world that end up being resolved where people still feel cheated and don’t result in building goodwill and better friendships doesn’t mean that is not what we should strive for. In fact many of these disputes are example where the parties have NOT applied the Four Way Test. There are innumerable examples of disputes where the parties work together to resolution and DO end up friends. These are all the ones the lawyers never deal with. Can you think of any in your life? 4) Will it be BENEFICIAL to all concerned? This is certainly not the way the world works. Almost invariably, what is good for one person is negative for another. There may be some “win-win” situations in life, but it’s important for mature people to realize that not every action can be beneficial or even fair to all parties concerned, and that for life to move forward smoothly, some people have to sacrifice. a. Unfortunately, I have to agree that the world today cannot be characterized as functioning for the benefit of all concerned. However, once again, the act of consciously thinking about whether or not the action you are about to take, or the words you are about to utter, will be beneficial to all concerned offers the opportunity of improving the outcome for ALL concerned. The Four Way Test is promoted for EVERYONE’S use, therefore when all parties are thinking in this way an even more harmonious outcome can be achieved. Sometimes the person that is doing the sacrificing is a Rotarian using this part of the Four Way Test to achieve service to others. Mr. Hecht’s argument really makes the point that Rotary should continue to promote the Four Way Test to improve decision making and make for better outcomes. After all, should we stop promoting world peace because it hasn’t happened yet? I don’t think so. Sam Wilbanks Loyalton, Calif., USA
At 10:25AM on 11 December 2009, gbemi soye tijani wrote: Yah!Meditatitively reflectively dispassionately i agree with Mery Hetch 'S VIES THAT ROTARY and the world have to wary in appliying THE 4 -WAY TEST to all situations and of course in promoting it in all cultures.First it has served as a compass of arbitration and concsssional fairness across the years when human compassion and respect for mutuality,individuality were commonplace .But now -THEOPPOSITE IS THE TRUTH.Truly again as Mery has observed even in Rotary meetings -atimes it can conlfict with issues at hand unless all are oriented that ALL ABOUT ROTARY IS SERVICE ABOVE SELF,VIOLUNTARY,especially the giving of time,talent and money by every member.However The 4 -way test has given the secular and possibly the spiritual world a perennial raw material for ethical chewing and digest that can surely orient guys and gals how to emotionally control personal excesses and exercicising rules to the maximum. The 4 way test as amplified by Herbert Taylor might not literarily be 100% applicable to all situations but it somehow has human face -a group dynamics posture too. Rtn GBEMISOYE TIJANI RC OF OLUYOLE ESTATE,IBADAN ND9125

Add a comment

* indicates a required field