Rotary.org: News - Council takes action on magazine subscriptions

 Council takes action on magazine subscriptions

  • Print
  • E-mail page

 
 

The Council voted to give Rotarians in the United States and Canada the option of receiving either a print copy or an electronic copy of The Rotarian.

Rotarians in the United States and Canada will be allowed to choose between receiving a print or an electronic copy of The Rotarian magazine following an action taken by the Council on Legislation 29 April in Chicago.

But representatives voted against giving a similar option to Rotarians outside the United States and Canada, who receive either The Rotarian or one of 31 regional magazines published by the Rotary World Magazine Press.

The Council rejected a proposal to do away with the subscription requirement altogether.

RI Director José Alfredo Sepúlveda explained that supporting print magazines is essential to Rotary’s communications strategy. “Having an official magazine and regional magazines is a necessity. The members of all important organizations receive a magazine that keeps them updated.”

Others pointed out that print magazines are a powerful tool for marketing to non-Rotarians and serve as Rotary’s primary way of reaching members who live in remote areas or lack Internet access.

Proponents of the choice argued that RI already has used online technology with great success, pointing to the recent transition of the print publication Rotary World to the electronic newsletter Rotary Leader. They said their aim was not to eliminate the print magazine.

“The magazine should be available at all times,” said Patricia M. Kasuda, of District 7620 (Washington, D.C.; parts of Maryland). “With today’s technology and RI’s partnership with Google Books, readers will get the same full-color articles the print magazine offers.”

But opponents noted that advertising revenues could decline and worried that the action could eventually lead to the demise of the print magazine.

“I’m addicted to the Internet, but I cannot agree with this measure because I love to hold the magazine in my hands and be able to pass it on to other people,” said Júlio J. D’Albuquerque Lóssio, of District 4490 (Brazil).

About 450,000 Rotarians in North America and 50,000 outside North America receive The Rotarian. The remaining 700,000 Rotarians subscribe to a regional magazine.

The Council also narrowly approved allowing joint subscriptions to the official magazine. Two Rotarians residing at the same address will have the option of sharing a subscription instead of paying for two subscriptions.

This enactment could result in a decrease in subscription revenues. The financial impact would be contingent upon the number of Rotarians who are living at the same address.

For more information


18 Comments:
At 1:44PM on 21 September 2010, Aird Flavelle wrote: My Rotary magazine just goes in the recycle bag completely unread. I resent the guilt of doing that! If I received it by email I would at least glance through it.
At 9:43AM on 10 August 2010, I-Ping Hsu wrote: Discrimination! Arrogance Prejudice! Its's pathetic that we, as an international organization, have to argue over this issue which I belief is common sense everywhere in this modern world, may be not including US and Canada! Rotary Theme for myself this year: Giving up your Rotary Dream
At 1:26PM on 9 August 2010, Ram Prasad Joshi wrote: There should be no discrimination among member clubs whether Clubs in USA, Canada or clubs in Asia. Rotary all clubs or members are equal. If discrimination is to be made why not low income countries are considered?
At 9:41AM on 4 June 2010, David McNicoll wrote: Differentiation between Rotarians of North American and the Rest of the World is incomprehensible. We are all equal, and electronic communication should be available to all.
At 11:21AM on 24 May 2010, Sue Morley wrote: We are one organisation not two. If one Rotarian is given the option of on line subscription then everyone should have that option. Those that don't have internet obviously won't take up that option. It's wrong to create a them and us environment and it definitely is not fair to all concerned. I personally prefer the hard copy because it can be left at doctor surgeries, waiting room at my work etc with our club contact details on the back which I think helps spread the Rotary Word.
At 11:02AM on 18 May 2010, Kero wrote: This is a disgusting decision! If its good enough for Rotarians in the US and Canada to be allowed to forego paper copy, why can't we all? Bridging Continents - baloney! I want my magazine online with no paper copy, with all the benefits that would entail for me and my environment.
At 9:20AM on 17 May 2010, Bakulesh Pandya wrote: The option of getting The Rotarian magazine, either electronic version or hard copies, given to USA and Canada is a welcome move by COL; but why it has been deprived to other countries?? Am sure Rotarians hailing from other countries are in no way inferior! This step motherly treatment is not in good taste, if we really call ourselves as international in nature!
At 9:14AM on 10 May 2010, Bronwen Scarffe wrote: The changes re. the option of a single subscription to Regional Magazines for couple Rotarians will have a positive impact on our capacity to keep membership dues down and this will in turn impact on our capacity to attract more couples into Rotary.
At 9:36AM on 6 May 2010, Diane Main wrote: It is fair to all concerned: I think NOT. We are a 2 Rotarian family. We subscribe to 2 copies of Rotary Down Under, because we HAVE to: I would prefer Electronic copy of The Rotarian & 1 Printed copy of RDU. Australia and other countries are not the US. Rotary is becoming very US Centric : definitely not fair to all concerned, nor will it build good will or better friendships.
At 4:16PM on 5 May 2010, Peter Sotheran (RC Guisborough & Great Ayton, D1030 wrote: "RI Director José Alfredo Sepúlveda explained that supporting print magazines is essential to Rotary’s communications strategy" So why are Rtns in the USA & Canada exempted from supporting this "essential" strategy?
At 1:43PM on 5 May 2010, Rtn.Sanjay Salvi wrote: Good news for me in particular because eversince i hav joined rotary since Feb 2009 and have subscribed for The Rotary News from day one, I am yet to receive a copy of the Rotary News. Had there been a option of choosing between a hard copy or ecopy, i think i wud have reveived all the editions which i hav missed out.
At 9:22AM on 4 May 2010, Nils Ottervik wrote: What a disgrace! Next Year we are supposed to bring home the message Bridging Continents. And yet the COL devide Rotary into North America that can use internet and the rest of the world that cannot. A possability to save on international Rotarys already too large expenses (money better spent on helping people) and reduce the enviromental impact of the organisation is turned down. How many north american council members voted for their own right to use internet and against the right of the rest of the world to do the same. A disgrace for the COL in particular and Rotary as a modern, international organisation in general.
At 12:05PM on 3 May 2010, Ian Sayers wrote: Surely this is a joke? To disallow the internet option is an insult to the rest of the Rotary world. We in the ANZO region have an excellent regional magzaine, "Rotary Down Under", that is available on line. I can't understand why we can't have that option to read it.
At 12:10PM on 3 May 2010, James A Dunn wrote: I am a member of the Rotary Club of Appin Park Wangaratta (district 9790) and I am almost blind. I am unable to read our regional rotary Down Under and feel that the magazine should eb made available to Rotarians like myself online. I have no problem paying the normal fees for it as I do get the magazine.The only difference is I get it in a format I can read. At present I get a magazine I cannot reead and is a waste.
At 12:08PM on 3 May 2010, Per Olav Stenseth wrote: This is not a too wise decision. It seems partly to be based on the belief that the US has a wider/deeper distribution of internet than other parts of the world. Check up on your data - this is not the case. It also gives an impression of thinking of the Rotary world as the US and the rest of the world. This is not contributing to a more united Rotaryworld either..
At 12:07PM on 3 May 2010, PDG Joe Mulkerrin(D-7600) wrote: Reconmend never do away with printing The Rotarian. Electronic only. Rns couterproductive to Public Affairs thrust. Do not want to eliminate members leaving copies at reception areas (doctor/ lawyer/etc offices) such that the general public can not be exposed to Rotary. What would happen to advertising revenue?
At 12:04PM on 3 May 2010, SN Agrawal wrote: Both good & bad news - good because at last, RI is giving option of a online magazine. Bad because members out side North America will be deprived! The move could have saved millions of trees & funds of RI.
At 11:56AM on 3 May 2010, Dr Lim Eng Lee wrote: Hard copies should be minimized. Rotary should lead the way by going soft. If clubs think that hard copies are powerful PR tool, then print it at club level. I know there are revenue and costs involved. If we can control 'carbon emission' in a physical way. Let us go on soft copy for 'The Rotarian' at least.

Add a comment

* indicates a required field